An Evaluation of Libyan Dentists' Perceptions, Concerns, and Attitudes Toward the Use of CBCT Imaging in Dental Implant Procedures

Authors

  • Faisal R A Alabeidi Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Dental Faculty, University of Benghazi, Libya
  • Eman A. B. AGUORI Department of Oral Medicine, oral Diagnosis, oral Radiology, Oral Pathology, University of Benghazi, Libya
  • Suliman Ali mustafa Eldaisi Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Dental Faculty, University of Benghazi, Libya
  • Nora Adem Fixed Prosthodontic Department, Dental Faculty, University of Benghazi, Libya

Keywords:

CBCT, Dental Implant, oral surgeries, , awareness, Libya

Abstract

Background: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) playing a critical role in presurgical planning, especially in the discipline of dental implantology. It provides high-resolution, three-dimensional imaging, essential for assessing bone volume, anatomical landmarks, and implant site morphology. Despite its clinical benefits, adoption may be hindered by concerns over radiation dose, cost, accessibility, and specialized training. Limited data exist on Libyan dentists' perspectives on CBCT usage. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions, concerns, and attitudes of Libyan dentists and specialists regarding CBCT in dental implant procedures. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a convenience sample of Libyan dentists involved in implant procedures. An electronic questionnaire with 22 multiple-choice questions was distributed to 103 participants via social media and email. Results: Seventy-one percent of participants had used CBCT. Of these, 51.5% used it "Often" (16.5%) or "Always" (35%). The primary benefits identified were precise treatment planning (38%) and improved diagnostic accuracy (23%). The main concerns were cost (44%) and availability (28%). Despite these concerns, 96% were likely to recommend CBCT, and 95% believed that dental schools should include CBCT training. The most influential factor in CBCT use was case complexity (58%).

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31